Energy-Tapping Pulsed Systems - Free Energy Generator

One very interesting feature of free-energy devices is that although various devices which appear to be completely different and have different apparent applications, the background operation is often the same.   It is clear that a sharp positive going DC electric pulse interacts with the surrounding energy field, making large quantities of free-energy available for anyone who has the knowledge of how to gather and use that extra energy.

Let me stress again that “over-unity” is an impossibility.   Over-unity suggests that more energy can be taken out of a system than the total energy which goes into the system.   This is not possible as you can’t have more than 100% of anything.   However, there is another perfectly valid way of looking at the operation of any system, and that is to rate the output of the system relative to the amount of energy that the user has to put in to make it work. 

This is called the “Coefficient Of Performance” or “COP” for short.   A COP = 1 is when all of the energy put in by the user is returned as useful output.   A COP>1 is where more useful energy comes out of the device than the user has to put in.   For example, a sailing boat in a good breeze transports people along without the need for the energy of movement to be supplied by the crew.   The energy comes from the local environment and while the efficiency is low, the COP is greater than 1.   What we are looking for here is not something to tap wind energy, wave energy, sunlight energy, river energy, thermal energy or whatever but instead we want something which can tap the invisible energy field which surrounds us all, namely the “zero-point energy” field.

For this, let us look at pulsing circuits used by a wide range of people in a number of apparently quite different devices.   An electrical “pulse” is a sudden voltage rise and fall with very sharply rising and falling voltages.   However, pulses are seldom generated as isolated events when working with practical devices, so it is probably better to think of a train of pulses, or a “waveform” with very sharp rising and falling edges.   These can be called oscillators or signal generators and are so commonplace that we tend not to give them a second thought, but the really important factors for using an oscillator for zero-point energy pick-up is the quality of the signal.

Ideally, what is needed cab a perfect square wave with no overshoot, and the voltage level never going below zero volts, or a complex waveform, also with very sharp attack and decay times.   These waveforms are a good deal more difficult to generate than you might imagine.

Even in these days of sophisticated solid-state electronic devices, the best method of creating a really sharp voltage pulse is still considered to be a spark gap, especially one which has the spark chopped off suddenly by the use of a strong magnetic field at right angles to the spark gap.   For an example of this style of operation, consider the following device.

Frank Prentice’s COP=6 Pulsed Aerial System.

Electrical Engineer Frank Wyatt Prentice of the USA invented what he described as an ‘Electrical Power Accumulator’ with an output power six times greater than the input power (COP = 6). He was granted a patent in 1923 which says: 

In the development of my WIRELESS TRAIN CONTROL SYSTEM for railways, covered by my United States Letters Patent Number 843,550, I discovered that with an antenna consisting of one wire of suitable diameter supported on insulators, three to six inches above the ground and extending one half mile, more or less in length, the antenna being grounded at one end through a spark gap, and energised at the other end by a high frequency generator of 500 watts input and having a secondary frequency of 500,000 Hz, would produce in the antenna, an oscillatory frequency the same as that of the earth currents and thus electrical power from the surrounding media was accumulated along the length of the transmission antenna and with a closed oscillatory loop antenna 18 feet in length run parallel with the transmission antenna at a distance of approximately 20 feet, it was possible to obtain by tuning the loop antenna, sufficient power to light to full candle power a series bank of 50 sixty-watt carbon lamps. Lowering or raising the frequency of 500,000 Hz resulted in a diminishing of the amount of power received through the 18 foot antenna. 

Likewise, raising the transmission antenna resulted in a proportionate decrease of power picked up on the receiving antennae and at 6 feet above the earth no power whatsoever was obtainable without a change of voltage and frequency. 

It is the objective of my generic invention to utilise the power generated by the earth, by the means described here and illustrated in the drawings. The two drawings show simple and preferred forms of this invention, but I wish it to be understood that no limitation is necessarily made as to the exact and precise circuits, shapes, positions and structural details shown here, and that changes, alterations and modifications may be made when desired within the scope of my invention and as specifically pointed out in the claims. 

Referring particularly to Fig.1, 1 and 2 are alternating current feed wires supplying 110 volts 60 cycles per second to a high-frequency generator. 3 is a switch with poles 4 and 5, while 6 and 7 are the connections to the high-frequency transformer 8, which is used to step-up the frequency to 500 kHz and the voltage to, say, 100 kV. 9 is an inductor, 10 is a spark gap, 11 is a variable capacitor, 12 is the primary winding and 13 the secondary winding of transformer 8. The secondary winding is connected to ground through variable capacitor 16, and wire 17. Wire 14 connects transformer 8 to the main transmission antenna 19 which is supported along it’s length on insulators 20. Spark gap 21 is positioned between the main transmission antenna 19 and the ground 24, passing through connecting wire 22 and variable capacitor 23. The main transmission antenna 19, can be any desired length. 

In Fig.2, 25 is a closed oscillating loop antenna of any desired length. For greatest efficiency, it is run parallel with the main transmission antenna 19 of Fig.1. Wire 26 is connected to the secondary winding 27 of a step-down transformer which winding then goes to ground 31 through variable capacitor 29. The primary winding 32 of the step-down transformer has variable capacitor 33 connected across it and it feeds directly into winding(s) 34 of frequency transformer(s) which supply current through winding(s) 35 to a motor “M” or other electrical load(s). 

Having described the drawings, I will now describe the operation of my invention. Operate switch 3 to connect the input power. Adjust spark gap 10 and variable capacitor 11 so that 100,000 volts at a frequency of 500,000 cycles per second is delivered to step-up transformer 8 of Fig.1. Next, adjust spark gap 21 of the transmission antenna 19 so that all (voltage) peaks and nodes are eliminated in the transmission of the 100,000 volts along the antenna by the current surges across spark gap 21. The high-frequency alternating current flowing through spark gap 21 passes through variable capacitor 23 to ground 24 and from there, back through the ground to earthing point 18, through variable capacitor 16 and back to winding 13 of transformer 8. As the 500,000 Hz current is the same as the earth-generated currents and in tune with it, it naturally follows that accumulation of earth currents will amalgamate with those for transformer 8, providing a reservoir of high-frequency currents to be drawn upon by a tuned circuit of that same 500 kHz frequency, such as that shown in Fig.2, where the antenna 25 is turned to receive a frequency of 500 kHz, which current then passes through transformer 27, any frequency-adjusting transformer(s), and on to power the load(s) 38. 

The return of current through the earth from transmission antenna 19, is preferable to return through a wire as the ground return current picks up more earth currents than a wire does. I also prefer under certain conditions, to use a single antenna wire in place of the closed loop antenna shown in Fig.2. Under certain operational requirements, I have had improved performance by having the transmission antenna elevated and carried on poles many feet above the earth, and with that arrangement it is necessary to use a different voltage and frequency in order to accumulate earth currents. 

This system of Frank’s effectively applies very sharply pulsed DC pulses to a long length of wire supported in a horizontal position not far above the ground.   The pulses are sharp due to both the spark gap on the primary side of the transformer, along with the spark-gap on the secondary (high voltage) side of the transformer.   An input power of 500 watts gives a 3 kW power output from what appears to be an incredibly simple piece of equipment. 

You may not know: Solves Tesla's Secret to Amplifying Power by Nearly 5000% - Groundbreaking Discovery

✰* Revealed At Last: Ancient Invention Generates Energy-On-Demand

✔ Nikola Tesla’s method of magnifying electric power by neutralizing the magnetic counter-forces in an electric generator

Generates Energy-On-Demand: Easy Power Plan Will Change Our World Forever

✔ Currents are 180 out of phase with each other, Lenz's law naturally is broken
✔ Principle of Resonance to achieve Overunity

Free Energy Generator by Dave Lawton

A solid-state semiconductor circuit which has proved successful in producing pulses like this is shown as part of Dave Lawton’s replication of Stan Meyer’s Water Fuel Cell.   Here, an ordinary NE555 timer chip generates a square wave which feeds a carefully chosen Field-Effect Transistor the BUZ350 which drives a water-splitter cell via a combined pair of choke coils at point “A” in the diagram below. 

Stan Meyer used a toroidal ferrite ring when he was winding these choke coils while Dave Lawton uses two straight ferrite bars, bridged top and bottom with thick iron strips.   Chokes wound on straight ferrite rods have been found to work very well also.   The effects are the same in all cases, with the waveform applied to the pipe electrodes being converted into very sharp, very short, high-voltage spikes.   These spikes unbalance the local quantum environment causing vast flows of energy, a tiny percentage of which happens to flow into the circuit as additional power.   The cell runs cold, and at low input current, quite unlike an ordinary electrolysis cell where the temperature rises noticeably and the input current needed is much higher.

Learn more: Revealed At Last: Ancient Invention Generates Energy-On-Demand - Free energy generator

Free energy generator by John Bedini

John Bedini uses this same pulsing of a bi-filar wound coil to produce the same very short, very sharp voltage spikes which unbalance the local energy field, causing major flows of additional energy.   The figure shown here is from his US patent 6,545,444. 

John has produced and generously shared, many designs, all of which are basically similar and all using a 1:1 ratio bi-filar wound transformer.   This one uses a free-running rotor with permanent magnets embedded in it’s rim, to trigger sharp induced currents in the windings of the coil unit marked “13b” which switches the transistor on, powering winding “13a” which powers the rotor on its way.   The pick-up coil “13c” collects additional energy from the local environment, and in this particular circuit, feeds it into the capacitor.   After a few turns of the rotor (dictated by the gear-down ratio to the second rotor), the charge in the capacitor is fed into a second “on-charge” battery. 

The rotor is desirable but not essential as the coils marked 1 and 2 can self-oscillate, and there can be any number of windings shown as 3 in the diagram.   Winding 3 produces very short, sharp, high-voltage spikes, which is the essential part of the design.   If those sharp pulses are fed to a lead-acid battery (instead of to a capacitor as shown above), then an unusual effect is created which triggers a link between the battery and the immediate environment, causing the environment to charge the battery.   This is an amazing discovery and because the voltage pulses are high-voltage courtesy of the 1:1 choke coils, the battery bank being charged can have any number of batteries and can be stacked as a 24-volt bank even though the driving battery is only 12 volts.   Even more interesting is the fact that charging can continue for more than half an hour after the pulsing circuit is switched off. 

It can be tricky to get one of these circuits tuned properly to work at peak performance, but when they are, they can have performances of COP>10.   The major snag is that the charging mechanism does not allow a load to be driven from the battery bank while it is being charged.   This means that for any continuous use, there has to be two battery banks, one on charge and one being used.   A further major problem is that battery banks are just not suitable for serious household use.   A washing machine draws up to 2.2 kilowatts and a wash cycle might be an hour long (two hours long if a “whites” wash and a “coloureds” wash are done one after the other which is not uncommon).   During the winter, heating needs to be run at the same time as the washing machine, which could well double the load. 

It is recommended that batteries are not loaded much beyond their “C20” rate, that is, one twentieth of their Amp-Hour nominal rating.   Say that 85 Amp-Hour deep-cycle leisure batteries are being used, then the recommended draw rate from them is 85 Amps divided by 20, which is 4.25 amps.   Let’s push it and say we will risk drawing double that, and make it 8.5 amps.   So, how many batteries would we need to supply our washing machine assuming that our inverter was 100% efficient?   Well, 2,200 watts on a 12-volts system is 2,200 / 12 = 183 amps, so with each battery contributing 8.5 amps, we would need 183 / 8.5 = 22 large, heavy batteries.   We would need twice that number if we were to treat them right, plus twice that again for household heating, say 110 batteries for an anyway realistic system.   That sheer size of battery banks is not realistic for your average householder or person living in an apartment.   Consequently, it appears that the Bedini pulse-charging systems are not practical for anything other than minor items of equipment. 

However, the really important point here is the way that when these short pulses are applied to a lead-acid battery, a link is formed with the environment which causes large amounts of energy to flow into the circuit from outside.   This is extra “free-energy”.   Interestingly, it is highly likely that if the pulses generated by Dave Lawton’s water-splitter circuit shown above, were fed to a lead-acid battery, then the same battery-charging mechanism is likely to occur.   Also, if a Bedini pulse-charging circuit were connected to a water-splitting cell like the Lawton cell, then it is highly probable that it would also drive that cell satisfactorily.   Two apparently different applications, two apparently different circuits, but both producing sharp high-voltage pulses which draw extra free-energy from the immediate environment.

Exclusive: 100 Year Old Device Will Completely Change Our Lives - Free Energy Generator

Energy-Tapping Pulsed Systems - The Tesla Switch - Free Energy Generator

It doesn’t stop there.   Nikola Tesla introduced the world to Alternating Current (“AC”) but later on he moved from AC to very short, sharp pulses of Direct Current (“DC”).   He found that by adjusting the frequency and duration of these high-voltage pulses, that he could produce a whole range of effects drawn from the environment - heating, cooling, lighting, etc.   The important point to note is that the pulses were drawing energy directly from the immediate environment.   Leaving aside the advanced equipment which Tesla was using during those experiments and moving to the simple-looking 4-battery Tesla Switch, we discover the same background operation of sharp voltage pulses drawing free-energy from the environment. 

I seriously doubt that this circuit had anything to do with Tesla, but instead it probably originated with Carlos Benitez. Strictly speaking, this particular version was probably produced by the staff of the Electrodyne Corp. of America. This circuit (shown in "The Manual of Free-Energy Devices and Systems" Vol.1, 1986) was tested by them for a period of three years: 

Please understand that the car batteries which they used in their circuit had become “conditioned” during their years of testing and they each had a voltage of 36 volts even though they were manufactured as 12-volt batteries. This circuit is a lot more subtle than it appears. The 1N1183 diodes are an essential part of the operation because those diodes break down when they are supposedly blocking current flow, and instead, they pass through them sharp voltage pulses. Those battery-charging pulses are the reason why the diodes appear to be connected backwards and supposedly blocking current flow to the positive contacts of the batteries. 

I suggest that this circuit is abandoned and instead the Benitez method of feeding charging pulses directly to both the batteries and the load be used instead. There has to be battery recharging. If you doubt this, then do the math: 

The load is powered by current which flows from two batteries in series (72 volts) into two batteries in parallel (36 volts). The batteries are lead-acid types which have an efficiency of only 50%, that is, they waste half of all of the charging energy fed into them. Let’s work an example: Say the two batteries in series provide 10 amps for a one-second period. Both of those batteries lose 10 amp-seconds of power. 

That 10 amps divides equally and 5 amps flows into each of the two batteries for a period of one second. That would be 5 amp-seconds of additional power IF it were not for the 50% efficiency of the battery. So only 2.5 amp-seconds of that power can be recovered from that battery, which in the next second is expected to supply 10 amp-seconds of power. 

So, effectively, we have 2.5 amp-seconds of recoverable power received for every 10 amp-seconds of actual power expended. This means that the battery will run down unless some form of battery charging takes place during the operation. Consequently, a battery charging system needs to be part of the “Load”. 

Carlos Benitez used switching of only once per hour and he added charging power to both the batteries and the load which was being power by his circuit. He did that like this: 

As there were no readily available electronic components back then, Carlos used an induction coil to produce the voltage spikes needed for charging the batteries. The equivalent nowadays is the much cheaper and easier to build “Joule Thief” circuit as described in chapter 6: 

Here is a solid-state version of the circuit: 

Here, six 2N3055 transistors (or the more convenient version the TIP3055) are switched On and Off by six audio transformers (possibly the Radio Shack #273-1380 transformers). The 8-ohm transformer primary windings are connected in series and driven by a square-wave generator through a large capacitor. This circuit is shown in red in the circuit diagram above. When the square wave is positive, transformers 1, 2 and 3 have their primary windings loaded by a forward-biased diode which limits the voltage across them to a maximum of about 0.7 volts and that keeps their operation short when they switch On. The other three transformers 4, 5 and 6 have the diodes across their primary windings positioned to block a positive voltage and so their transistors remain Off. 

When the output voltage of the square-wave generator goes negative, the situation is reversed and transformers 4, 5 and 6 switch on briefly while transformers 1, 2 and 3 remain Off. The diodes across the primary windings are 1N4148 diodes which have a very fast switching time which can be very important for circuits of this type. The other diodes are 1N1183 which are rated at 50 volts and 40 amps.

Free Energy Generator: Get The Complete Ultimate Energizer Guide